Council says demolition ballots must wait for Labour government

Written by on December 5, 2017 in Campaigns, Council, News - 2 Comments
Cressingham Gardens

Cressingham Gardens

Lambeth council has responded to calls for a ballot of residents of Cressingham Gardens on plans to demolish and rebuild the estate by saying that Labour party policy on such ballots would apply to future decisions under a Labour government.

Deputy leader, investment and partnerships, Paul McGlone said: “Labour party policy on ballots would apply to future estate decisions under a Labour government, when councils would have access to the new powers, flexibility and funding to provide decent homes that are currently denied to them by this government.”

He said the council has worked closely with residents over the past few years on its plans to rebuild Cressingham Gardens, which overlooks Brockwell Park at the top of Tulse Hill.

The rebuild, he said, would “provide those people currently living in poor quality and overcrowded homes with brand new homes to meet their needs, as well as delivering new council homes for families on the housing waiting list.”

The council says the demolition and rebuilding of the estate, which currently has just over 300 homes, will result in 158 extra ones, including 27 family sized homes at council rent levels. Some of the new building would be for private rent or sale to help pay the estimated £80 million cost of the redevelopment.

Opponents say that the plan would result in a maximum of 23 extra homes at social rent.

Demolition is due to begin in two years’ time. Getting planning permission is expected to take a year.

Plans drawn up by residents for redevelopment intended to preserve existing homes and add new ones were rejected by the council.

A protest by Cressingham residents and supporters in Brixton on Saturday heard repeated demands that the Labour-controlled Lambeth council should follow developments in party policy calling for ballots of residents in estates facing regeneration.

This year’s Labour party conference called for “full binding ballot rights for estate residents in any ongoing and future regeneration projects”. In his closing speech, leader Jeremy Corbyn said that, too often, so-called regeneration of social housing meant “forced gentrification and social cleansing”.

The specialist social housing publication Inside Housing reported that Labour party sources had told it that the ballot policy was  only intended to be applied if and when the party came to power. It added that the vote would not  automatically become Labour policy because the party’s national policy forum has the final say.

Lambeth’s plans for the Cressingham estate differ from those of other controversial redevelopments in Southwark and Haringey, north London, in that the “development vehicle” to be used to fund the work is intended, initially, to be wholly owned by the council.

The council says that its “Homes for Lambeth” organisation will “undertake commercial development for the benefit of local people – so that we retain and reinvest surpluses into building homes and delivering the services that local people need and desire”.

The council would “grant long leases to Homes for Lambeth to build new homes. However, the council will still own the land. In addition, council tenants who move into a home owned by Homes for Lambeth will still be managed by Lambeth council.”

But the policy does not rule out future “shared equity” schemes. It says there will be the potential for Homes for Lambeth to create subsidiary companies: “These could be joint ventures in which the equity could be shared with a third party. The council would consider doing this so, for example, we can use right to buy receipts to build more and better homes”.

The council is using the giant property company Savills to help it set up its own housing association which, it says, will rent properties built by Homes for Lambeth at about a third of market rent.

At the same time, acting as a commercial property developer through Homes for Lambeth, the council believes it can “use the 15-20% development surplus that private developers normally make” to build more homes for local people.

It has agreed a £6.5 million contract to manage the Cressingham Gardens project with multinational consultancy Mott MacDonald.

The council says the contract represents less than 8% of the total cost of redeveloping Cressingham Gardens – putting it at more than £80 million.

Mott MacDonald was appointed formally last month and its staff have invited Cressingham residents to meet its representatives. Lambeth council has also appointed an “independent adviser” for residents.

The council’s “design team” says it met residents last week to start to learn “more about what residents want and how they want to get involved”.

Its intended timetable would see residents “sharing their views” with the team until autumn 2018, followed by a year to gain planning permission for the proposed redevelopment.

Demolition of existing homes is planned to begin in December 2019 with work on new buildings due to start in early 2020. The earliest time that new homes would be completed is 2021.

About the Author

Alan Slingsby moved to Brixton just as the 1981 uprising began. His nearest pub was the Effra and nearest off licence the Frontline — long gone in an earlier wave of closures of treasured community establishments. Has edited newspapers for the National Union of Students and National Union of Teachers. Now makes a living designing magazines and books and anything else people will pay him for.

2 Comments on "Council says demolition ballots must wait for Labour government"

  1. Andrew Sherman December 13, 2017 at 8:37 pm · Reply

    Cllr McGlone’s statement at the start of the article about ballots only applying to future estate decisions is in direct contradiction to your own explication of the conference motion later in the article. Either your sub-ed was asleep, or you chose not to contradict the Cllr. Either way, bad show.

    As for the “design team” for Mott McDonald meeting residents, you might find an enquiry as to how many residents attended, informative. Single figures at both events. There’s little trust between residents and what they see as the opposition, whatever the council and the council-funded “Independent Advisor” says otherwise.

  2. Decidendi December 5, 2017 at 12:08 pm · Reply

    This reads like a puff piece for the council.

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: